Legal Opinion

Jacobs v. Gulf Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided March 31, 2004No. CA 03-803PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert J. Gladwin, Judge.

Appellants brought suit under the direct-action statute, Ark. Code Ann. § 23-79-210 (Repl. 1999), against appellee, who is their employer’s commercial automobile insurer. They sought benefits under their employer’s uninsured motorist coverage for injuries they sustained when the boom-and-bucket device that they were using failed and crashed to the ground. The trial court granted summary judgment against appellants, finding that they were precluded under the workers’ compensation exclusive-remedy doctrine from pursuing a negligence claim against their employer’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Aetna Insurance v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. Pardon v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. South Beach Beverage Co. v. Harris Brands, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Home Insurance v. HarwellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  5. Holt Bonding Co. v. First Federal Bank of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cross v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  2. Jacobs v. Gulf Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API