Legal Opinion

Pascarella v. Pascarella

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 1994No. Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter *916remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court dismissed plaintiffs cause of action for divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment because plaintiff failed to offer proof to corroborate her testimony. That was error; no corroboration is required (see, Hird v Hird, 170 AD2d 1049). Upon our review of the record, we conclude that there is not sufficient legal evidence to grant a divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment.

The proof is legally…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Diemer v. DiemerNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. De Angelis v. De AngelisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Maryon v. MaryonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  4. Hird v. HirdAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. CarpenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. James v. JamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. McNair v. McNairAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Smith v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Davis v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API