Legal Opinion
Hird v. Hird
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 1, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted plaintiff a judgment of divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment. Although the court should have stated "the facts it deems essential” (CPLR 4213 [b]), reversal is not required because *1050the record on appeal is complete and permits this court to make the proper findings (see, Katzenstein v Katzenstein, 90 AD2d 533, 534; Schwartz v Schwartz, 52 AD2d 874; Keklak v Keklak, 49 AD2d 926). The testimony established that defendant physically and verbally abused and threatened plaintiff and that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- D'Amato v. D'AmatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Pfeil v. PfeilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Borg v. BorgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Barry v. BarryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Keklak v. KeklakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kavanakudiyil v. KavanakudiyilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Pascarella v. PascarellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994