Wolfe v. Schuster
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
GUITTARD, Chief Justice.
In this declaratory judgment action, we •must determine whether a justiciable controversy exists. If it does, we must construe the provisions of a promissory note allowing certain offsets against the note. This provision is alleged to be equivalent to a guaranty of the collection of sums payable to the maker from a third party as lessee under a commercial lease. The trial court dismissed the suit for lack of a justiciable controversy. We find that a justicia-ble controversy exists, and we agree that the provision in question is equivalent to a guaranty of collection,'…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Universal Metals & MacHinery, Inc. v. BohartTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- Hopkins v. First National Bank at BrownsvilleTexas Supreme Court · 1977
- Morriss v. First Nat. Bank of MissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Empire Life Insurance Co. of America v. MoodyTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Wood v. Canfield Paper Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Peck v. MacK Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Ford v. Darwin, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
- City of Austin v. City of Cedar Park, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
- Cusimano v. First Maryland Savings & Loan, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- City of Austin v. City of Cedar Park And Wilson Land and Cattle Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.