Legal Opinion

Wolfe v. Schuster

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 21, 1979No. 20072PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUITTARD, Chief Justice.

In this declaratory judgment action, we •must determine whether a justiciable controversy exists. If it does, we must construe the provisions of a promissory note allowing certain offsets against the note. This provision is alleged to be equivalent to a guaranty of the collection of sums payable to the maker from a third party as lessee under a commercial lease. The trial court dismissed the suit for lack of a justiciable controversy. We find that a justicia-ble controversy exists, and we agree that the provision in question is equivalent to a guaranty of collection,'…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Universal Metals & MacHinery, Inc. v. BohartTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Hopkins v. First National Bank at BrownsvilleTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Morriss v. First Nat. Bank of MissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  4. Empire Life Insurance Co. of America v. MoodyTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Wood v. Canfield Paper Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Peck v. MacK Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Ford v. Darwin, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  3. City of Austin v. City of Cedar Park, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
  4. Cusimano v. First Maryland Savings & Loan, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. City of Austin v. City of Cedar Park And Wilson Land and Cattle Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API