Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Anjo Construction Co.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 1, 1985No. Appeals, Nos. 623 C.D. 1983 and 963 C.D. 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Rogers,
Each Anjo Construction Company, Incorporated (Anjo) and the Commonwealth Department of Transportation (DOT) has appealed from an order of the Board of Claims directing DOT to pay Anjo the sum of $25,537.00, plus interest, for material used by Anjo in making repairs to a state-owned road.
The Board of Claims made the following findings of fact which economically state the case:(3) On the basis of a bid it submitted, Anjo and PennDOT entered into a written contract dated April 13, 1977 for slabjacking and concrete patching to repair L.R. 1016-72-641-1023 ... in Allegheny…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Space Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- C. J. Langenfelder & Son, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Montgomery v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- J. A. & W. A. Hess, Inc. v. Hazle TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Dick Corp. v. State Public School Building AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Department of Transportation v. Herbert R. Imbt, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. Burrell Construction & Supply Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- PennDOT v. BURRELL CONST. & SUP. CO., INC.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- R. W. Dunteman Co. v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1999