Legal Opinion

Dalva v. Bailey

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 19, 1957PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BICKS, District Judge.

Maurice Dalva and Nathan Hausman, ■stockholders of Pantepec Oil Company, instituted a derivative action in this Court on April 18, 1957. Upon Pantepec’s motion for security for expenses pursuant to New York General Corpora-' tion Law, McKinney’s Consol.Laws, c. '23, § 61-b, an order was made directing plaintiffs to file a bond in the amount of $50,000, “provided, however, that if, within sixty (60) days * * * joinder of additional stockholders * * * is effected so that this action will be maintained by holders of at least 5% of the outstanding shares * * * or by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clark v. Sandusky Appeal of De RoseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
  2. Otis Elevator Co. v. Standard Construction Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1950
  3. Kaufman v. WolfsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  4. Weinstein v. BehnNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Markovic v. National City BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Harry J. Stadin v. Union Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  2. Frank J. Kozak v. Willard B. Wells, Administrator, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  3. Hausman v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  4. Hausman v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  5. E. N. Maisel & Associates v. Canden Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API