Dalva v. Bailey
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
BICKS, District Judge.
Maurice Dalva and Nathan Hausman, ■stockholders of Pantepec Oil Company, instituted a derivative action in this Court on April 18, 1957. Upon Pantepec’s motion for security for expenses pursuant to New York General Corpora-' tion Law, McKinney’s Consol.Laws, c. '23, § 61-b, an order was made directing plaintiffs to file a bond in the amount of $50,000, “provided, however, that if, within sixty (60) days * * * joinder of additional stockholders * * * is effected so that this action will be maintained by holders of at least 5% of the outstanding shares * * * or by the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Clark v. Sandusky Appeal of De RoseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- Otis Elevator Co. v. Standard Construction Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1950
- Kaufman v. WolfsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Weinstein v. BehnNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Markovic v. National City BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
3Cited by12 opinions
- Harry J. Stadin v. Union Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Frank J. Kozak v. Willard B. Wells, Administrator, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- Hausman v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Hausman v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- E. N. Maisel & Associates v. Canden Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.