Legal Opinion
Chacko v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 24, 2021No. 2:19-cv-01837Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 RUBY CHACKO, No. 2:19-cv-01837-JAM-DB 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S RULE 60(b) MOTION FOR RELIEF 12 AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NO. 3, 13 Defendant. 14 15 I. BACKGROUND 16 Before the Court is Ruby Chacko’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for 17 relief from the Court’s April 27, 2020 Order at ECF No. 37 18 (“Prior Order”) granting in part and denying in part her motion 19 for reconsideration. 1 See Pl.’s Mot. for Relief (“Mot.”), ECF 20 No. 87. As relevant here, the Court denied Plaintiff’s request 21 to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mark Stephan v. Unum Life Insurance Company OfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Charles L. Corn v. Guam Coral Company, Inc., Panciteria Far East, Inc. v. Guam Coral Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- United States v. State Of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Paul Revere Variable Annuity Insurance v. KirschhoferCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000