Legal Opinion

United States v. State Of Oregon

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 29, 1985No. 83-4254PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

769 F.2d 1410

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

and

The Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian

Nation; the Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs

Reservation of Oregon; Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla

Indian Reservation; and Nez Perce Tribe of Idaho,

Intervenors-Appellees,

v.

STATE OF OREGON, Defendant,

State of Washington, Defendant-Appellant,

State of Idaho, Intervenor.

No. 83-4254.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted July 9, 1985.

Decided Aug. 29, 1985.

Maria A. Iizuka, Dirk D. Snel, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the U.S.A.

Howard…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. System Federation No. 91 v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Prudential Real Estate Affiliates, Inc. v. PPR Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. WisconsinDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1987
  3. 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5693, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9188 Evan Arthur Hook v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. Pacific Rivers Council v. ThomasDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1996
  5. 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7837, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,977 Evan Arthur Hook v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API