Legal Opinion

Pomeranz v. Dineen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 18, 1985PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.), dated January 16, 1985, which granted defendant Daniel B. Dineen’s motion to dismiss the first, second and third causes of action of the complaint insofar as they are asserted against him.

Order modified, by adding a provision that plaintiffs, if they be so advised, may serve an amended complaint setting forth any appropriate cause of action they may have against defendant Daniel B. Dineen. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Falk v. GoodmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Bright v. O'NeillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Takayama v. SchaeferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. 88 Blue Corp. v. Staten Builders Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. BTS, Inc. v. Webny Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Zwirn v. GoodmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API