Legal Opinion
Falk v. Goodman
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 30, 1959PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDye, J.
In this action to recover a deposit made in connection with a contract for the purchase and sale of a dwelling, the plaintiffs have a judgment in their favor entered on an order granting a motion for summary judgment (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 113).
According to the complaint, the contract of purchase and sale was conditioned on the plaintiffs’ ability to obtain a bank commitment and Federal Housing Administration (FHA) approval for an FHA mortgage in the sum of $16,250 for a period of 30 years at the prevailing rate of interest. In the event that such a mortgage commitment could not be obtained…
2Cited by58 opinions
- Rand v. New York Times Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Takayama v. SchaeferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Strychalski v. MekusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Marano v. Mercy HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- News America Marketing, Inc. v. Lepage Bakeries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.