Legal Opinion

Brown v. Southeast Louisiana Contractors of Norco, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 1999No. 99-CA-735Published

1Opinion of the Court

LEDWARDS, Judge.

Claimant/appellant James D. Brown filed a claim for worker’s compensation, averring that as a result of his exposure to the toxic chemical sodium hydroxide he suffered acute injuries to his upper respiratory system and severe neurotoxicity and was disabled. Penalties and attorney fees for arbitrary and capricious refusal to pay compensation and medical benefits were also requested. His employer, Southeast Louisiana Contractors, disputed the claim. Following a trial, the court found the claim was without merit and dismissed the case. We affirm, finding that Mr. Brown failed to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sistler v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  2. Bruno v. Harbert Intern. Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  3. Sparks v. Tulane Med. Ctr. Hosp. & ClinicSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  4. Benoit v. MacO Mfg.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Smith v. Grand Isle ShipyardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API