DeRose v. DeRose
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Chief Justice:
Plaintiff, Phyllis Urie DeRose, contests as inequitable and unjust to her the division of property and award of alimony in the divorce decree.
The evidence to establish sufficient ground for a divorce was uncontested by the defendant. The dispute between the parties both at the trial and upon this appeal by the plaintiff, is over the allocation of their'property and income. 1
The parties had been married for 21 years. They had two children, Richard, age 19,i presently ill'the armed services, and Deboi-ah,- age.1 14,. living at home. The defendant is a. railroad, engineer…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nokes v. Continental Mining & Milling Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1957
- Wilson v. WilsonUtah Supreme Court · 1956
- Bader v. BaderUtah Supreme Court · 1967
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jackson v. JacksonUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Dogu v. DoguUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Christensen v. ChristensenUtah Supreme Court · 1968
- Hacking v. HackingUtah Supreme Court · 1980