Legal Opinion

DeRose v. DeRose

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1967No. 10718PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Chief Justice:

Plaintiff, Phyllis Urie DeRose, contests as inequitable and unjust to her the division of property and award of alimony in the divorce decree.

The evidence to establish sufficient ground for a divorce was uncontested by the defendant. The dispute between the parties both at the trial and upon this appeal by the plaintiff, is over the allocation of their'property and income. 1

The parties had been married for 21 years. They had two children, Richard, age 19,i presently ill'the armed services, and Deboi-ah,- age.1 14,. living at home. The defendant is a. railroad, engineer…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nokes v. Continental Mining & Milling Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Wilson v. WilsonUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Bader v. BaderUtah Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. JacksonUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Dogu v. DoguUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Christensen v. ChristensenUtah Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Hacking v. HackingUtah Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API