Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Ueno

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided May 20, 1998No. 05-97-01295-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMAS, Chief Justice.

Lance S. Ueno appeals the denial of the relief sought by his application for writ of habeas corpus by which he raised collateral estoppel as a plea in bar of prosecution of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance. We conclude that

• the doctrine of collateral estoppel, as embodied in the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, necessarily contemplates that an applicant has been previously placed in jeopardy; and

• if an applicant has never been placed in jeopardy, that applicant may not use the extraordinary…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Illinois v. VitaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Ex Parte RobinsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Rodriguez, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1999
  2. Ex Parte Necessary, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  3. Ex parte HeadrickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. Ex Parte Craig Alan Necessary, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
  5. Mark Angelo Guajardo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API