Loudermilk v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. Of New York
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.
Brought against Opal Tingle, the named insured in an automobile policy, No. VF 1, 001, 176, plaintiff had issued, and Horace Tingle, the driver of the car, and against Mrs. Loudermilk and Mrs. Brooks, who had sued the Tingles for collision damages, the suit was for a declaration of its rights and obligations with respect to the policy. The claim in general 1 was that the col lision had occurred at 6:30 P.M., July 16, 1950; that prior to that date plaintiff as insurer, 'had issued to Miss Tingle, and she had accepted, an automobile liability insurance policy insuring her…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Colby v. KluneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Rushing v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Gray Tool Co. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
- Finkelberg v. Continental Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
- Spann v. Commercial Standard Ins. Co. of Dallas, Tex.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Subin v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- García López v. Méndez GarcíaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963
- Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Thomas J. Murphy v. George LightCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- White v. LuberDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.