Legal Opinion

Exchange Corporation of Wisconsin v. Kuntz

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1972No. 189PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.

It is to be noted the form of the order appealed from is unusual in that it orders the vendees to pay the balance of the purchase price rather than granting them time within which to redeem the property. However, the parties consider this order to be one extending the time within which to redeem in a strict foreclosure action after the original time to redeem had expired. In making this order, the trial court forced a settlement upon the parties, both of whom it considered to be stubborn. Although it doubted its power or jurisdiction, the court made the order to finally terminate the matter…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kallenbach v. Lake Publications, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Button v. SchroyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Dickson v. LoehrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Cyrowski v. WojcikMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Loehr v. DicksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Berge v. Sweet (In Re Berge)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1983
  2. Steiner v. Wisconsin American Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Coraci v. NoackWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Marcott v. Euclide (In Re Marcott)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1983
  5. Republic Bank of Chicago v. LichosytCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API