Legal Opinion
Stribling v. Polunsky
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 19, 1946No. 9571PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McClendon, chief justice.
The sole question this appeal presents is whether Tom Richey and Albert Brown were necessary parties to this suit; which was one in trespass to try title and to remove cloud from title to real estate in San Angelo. The suit was brought by Harry Polunsky and Harry M. Shklar, vendees of the property under deed from Richey and Brown, against J. C. and John B. Stribling, who held a contract of purchase previously executed by Richey and Brown.
The salient facts, shown by the pleadings and evidence, were:
On January 12, 1945, Richey and Brown (doing business under a stated…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Veal v. ThomasonTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Stewart v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Askey v. StroudCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Grindstaff v. MatherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- Hart v. WilsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Country Cupboard, Inc. v. Texstar Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Standard Oil Company of Texas and New Idria Mining & Chemical Company v. J. W. Marshall, D/B/A Marshall Pipe & Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959