Legal Opinion

Shockey v. Huhtamaki, Inc.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided August 9, 2010No. Case 09-CV-2260-JAR-DJWPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JULIE A. ROBINSON, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on plaintiffs’ Motion for Conditional Certification of Class Claims Under § 216(b) of the FLSA (Doc. 35) and defendant’s Unopposed Request for Oral Argument (Doc. 61). The parties have fully briefed the issues, and the Court has reviewed their arguments, attachments, and the parties’ supplemental submissions. In light of the record provided, the Court finds additional oral argument is unnecessary. For the reasons stated below, the Court grants plaintiffs’ motion for conditional certification of this…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Longcrier v. HL-A CO., INC.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2009
  4. Vaszlavik v. Storage Technology Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1997
  5. Brown v. Money Tree Mortgage, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Creely v. HCR ManorCare, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011
  2. Anduin Lightner, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. DaVita, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2026
  3. Babbit v. Target CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
  4. Bowling v. DaVita, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2023
  5. Butler v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API