Legal Opinion

United States v. Albert R. Gamble

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 16, 1979No. 78-3407PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUG, Circuit Judge:

The defendant-appellant, Albert R. Gamble, challenges his conviction on two counts of willful failure to file income tax returns in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7203. He claims error based upon the constitutionality of the Internal Revenue Code, the double jeopardy bar to reprosecution, the admission of certain evidence, and the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. We affirm.

FACTS

Gamble is an attorney who practices law in Arizona as a sole practitioner. The charges against him stem from his filing and failure to file income tax returns for the 1971, 1972 and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. United States v. William R. Ming, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  5. United States v. Juan Gerardo RojasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert Lee Green, A/K/A HopeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
  2. United States v. Warren H. EilertsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. Leonard L. PayneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Julius ZimmelmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. Briggs v. FenstermakerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API