United States v. Julius Zimmelman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Julius Zimmelman appeals pursuant to Abney v. United States, 431 U.S. 651, 659, 97 S.Ct. 2034, 2040, 52 L.Ed.2d 651 (1977), from the denial of a motion to dismiss an indictment on grounds of double jeopardy. 1 We affirm.
After a jury trial resulted in Zimmelman’s conviction, the district court granted Zimmelman’s motion for a mistrial based upon alleged prosecutorial misconduct in the cross-examination of a witness. In doing so, the court ordered a new trial and denied Zimmelman’s request to dismiss the indictment.
The Double Jeopardy Clause bars re-prosecution of a case after the grant of a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Albert R. GambleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
3Cited by1 opinion
- Chau v. United States Securities & Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014