Legal Opinion

United States v. Julius Zimmelman

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 30, 1980No. 80-1332PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Julius Zimmelman appeals pursuant to Abney v. United States, 431 U.S. 651, 659, 97 S.Ct. 2034, 2040, 52 L.Ed.2d 651 (1977), from the denial of a motion to dismiss an indictment on grounds of double jeopardy. 1 We affirm.

After a jury trial resulted in Zimmelman’s conviction, the district court granted Zimmelman’s motion for a mistrial based upon alleged prosecutorial misconduct in the cross-examination of a witness. In doing so, the court ordered a new trial and denied Zimmelman’s request to dismiss the indictment.

The Double Jeopardy Clause bars re-prosecution of a case after the grant of a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. Albert R. GambleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chau v. United States Securities & Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API