Legal Opinion

Seligman v. Fenton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 1926No. Appeal, 157PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Walling,

In this bill in equity plaintiff seeks to restrain defendant from alleged unfair business competition. The case was heard upon bill, answer and testimony, from which the trial court made comprehensive findings of facts and legal conclusions and, in due course, entered a final decree dismissing the bill; plaintiff has appealed.

There was evidence to support the facts as found and the decree necessarily followed. Over twenty years ago, J. M. Fenton entered upon the business of storage and moving, with location near Kershaw and Fifty-second streets, Philadelphia;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Howe Scale Co. v. Wyckoff, Seamans & BenedictSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Meneely v. . MeneelyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Russia Cement Co. v. LePageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  4. Royal Baking Powder Co. v. RoyalCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Goidl v. Advance Neckwear Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Tanner-Brice Co. v. SimsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  3. John H. Gates v. Gates Coal Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Edelstein v. EdelsteinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Ralph Bros. Furniture Co. v. RalphSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API