Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Ostrom

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 5, 1932No. Docket No. 4609PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (R. L.), J.

The plaintiff obtained judgment for $15,000 damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile casualty. The cause was tried with a jury. Upon motion, the court granted a new trial on the grounds that the amount of damages is excessive and that the judgment is not supported by the evidence. Prom this order granting a new trial the plaintiff appealed.

On the evening of September 22, 1930, plaintiff and three other men accompanied the defendant as guests in his Ford sedan on a fishing expedition from Escalón to the Stanislaus River. Only one member of the party…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Peri v. CulleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kataoka v. May Department Stores Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Creamer v. CerratoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Adams v. LebowMissouri Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. Alexander v. Wong YickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Weaver v. Shell Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API