Dahlquist v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
Action for personal injuries and for damage to plaintiff’s truck resulting from a collision between his 1935 Ford pickup and one of defendant’s locomotives. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff. Plaintiff appealed from an order granting defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, made in response to an alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.
We are confronted at the threshold of consideration of this case by the fact that the settled case does not disclose a motion to direct a verdict in favor of defendant at the close of all the evidence offered. The fact that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kies v. SearlesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Parker v. FrybergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Central Metropolitan Bank v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Callahan v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Rieke v. St. Albans Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kugling v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Dahlquist v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950