Legal Opinion

Dahlquist v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 10, 1950No. 35,023PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Action for personal injuries and for damage to plaintiff’s truck resulting from a collision between his 1935 Ford pickup and one of defendant’s locomotives. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff. Plaintiff appealed from an order granting defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, made in response to an alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.

We are confronted at the threshold of consideration of this case by the fact that the settled case does not disclose a motion to direct a verdict in favor of defendant at the close of all the evidence offered. The fact that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kies v. SearlesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Parker v. FrybergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Central Metropolitan Bank v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. Callahan v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  5. Rieke v. St. Albans Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kugling v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Dahlquist v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API