Legal Opinion
Schmitt v. Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson & Hornik, LLP
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided October 15, 2021No. 8:21-cv-00011Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA VICTOR E. SCHMITT, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated; and CHERYL SCHMITT, on 8:21CV11 behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiffs, vs. RAUSCH, STURM, ISRAEL, ENERSON & HORNIK, LLP, GREGORY W. ENERSON, JULIE A. RAUSCH, PAUL THIELHELM, and DISCOVER BANK, Defendants. This matter is before the undersigned magistrate judge on Defendant Discover Bank’s motion to compel arbitration. (Filing No. 37). Defendants Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson & Hornik, LLP, Gregory W.…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.