Legal Opinion
United States v. Flournoy
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 23, 2016No. 14-2325PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANION, Circuit Judge.
Following a jury trial, Michael Flournoy was convicted of one count of conspiring to possess cocaine and one count of attempting to possess cocaine. Flournoy appeals, claiming he is entitled to a new trial because the prosecutor made inappropriate *526comments • during closing argument and because the government presented testimony from a cooperating witness that conflicted with that witness’s plea agreement. Flournoy also claims that the district court erred in adding several discretionary conditions to the terms of his supervised release without explanation. We affirm…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bradshaw v. StumpfSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. Domingo BlountCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Edward Kuzniar and George PistasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. AlviarCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Gregory WolfeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. Earl WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Tracy ConleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Michael ChaparroCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Carl MooseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Deronarte NorwoodCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.