Legal Opinion
Rosen v. Solomon
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 18, 1974No. Civ. A. 73-2793PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TROUTMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff and defendants, Solomon and Coe, entered into a stock option agreement. Upon notice by the plaintiff that he intended to exercise the option, defendants allegedly defaulted. Thereafter, plaintiff commenced this action and defendant Coe has moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction over the person pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2) and for insufficiency of service of process pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(5). The relevant facts as they pertain to this motion are as follows:
On August 31, 1971, defendants’ attorney met with…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Arthur H. Aftanase v. Economy Baler Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Gardner Engineering Corporation v. Page Engineering CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Myers v. Mooney Aircraft, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Strick Corp. v. A. J. F. Warehouse Distributors, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- B. J. McAdams, Inc. v. BoggsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Columbia Metal Culvert Co. v. Kaiser Industries Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Lee v. CarlsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Nikwei v. Ross School of Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.