Legal Opinion
STOCKTON v. Belk, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided August 20, 2021No. 1:19-cv-00332Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE CHATTANOOGA DIVISION HEATHER STOCKTON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. 2:19-cv-00332-JPM-CHS v. ) ) BELK, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Before the Court is Defendant Belk, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment, filed on December 1, 2020. (ECF No. 21.) Belk argues that Plaintiff Heather Stockton cannot prove the duty or causation elements of her negligence claim as a matter of law and that therefore Belk is entitled to summary judgment in its favor. (ECF No. 22 at PageID 216.)…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.