Legal Opinion

Borst v. Gale

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 15, 1930PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

A bill was filed by the appellants in the circuit court in and for Putnam County, for the purpose of quieting the title to real estate, and the appellees, James Gale, William D. Gale, and Marie B. Gale, together with numerous other parties, if living and if dead, their unknown heirs at law, legatees, devisees or grantees, were therein named as defendants to the suit.

James, William D. and Marie B. Gale, appeared in the cause and answered the bill. Several months after the said answer was filed, the court made a decree in said cause which reads as follows:

"This cause having come on to be heard…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lovett and Lovett v. LovettSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Thomson v. KyleSupreme Court of Florida · 1897
  3. Macfarlane v. HillsSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
  4. Verdier v. City of TampaSupreme Court of Florida · 1923

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gagnon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  2. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  3. Lesperance v. LesperanceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  4. Slaughter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  5. Phillips v. Lindsay Et Vir.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API