Legal Opinion
Madonna Corp. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 15, 1990No. 89-02352PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Acting Chief Judge.
The questions of law we respond to in this matter arise from the demise of the Park Bank (the Bank) in Pinellas County and the assumption of its assets by the appellee, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The trial court granted the FDIC’s motion for a summary judgment and we affirm.
The setting leading to our conclusions may be summarized as follows:
On or about August 11, 1978, the appellant, Tierra Verde, entered into a contract for deed with Caru Corporation as the purchaser of the property that is the subject of this foreclosure action. Upon the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Harold v. Beighley v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation v. Two Rivers Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- In The Matter Of: Cts Truss, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cimarron Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. McKnightCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992
- Ditech Holding CorporationUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Prudential Insruance Co. of America v. Allied Tower, Ltd.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993