Legal Opinion

In the Interest of R.M.H.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 10, 1992No. 13-91-548-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEERDEN, Justice.

This appeal arises from an adoption case, in which the trial court assessed costs including ad litem fees against appellant, the Texas Department of Human Services. By its appeal, Human Services contends that the trial court erred in assessing these fees because the department cannot constitutionally or statutorily comply with the judgment. Alternatively, Human Services contends that sovereign immunity insulates the department from liability for court costs. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Previous to this proceeding, the courts terminated the parent-child…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Kierstead v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Warren Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  4. Parker County v. Spindletop Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fought & Co. v. Steel Engineering & Erection, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  2. City of Houston v. Jose Alberto Corrales, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2025
  3. State v. Lead Industries AssociationSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API