Legal Opinion
In Re Garcia
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California
Decided November 22, 2004No. 14-07025PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
JOHN J. HARGROVE, Chief Judge.
The chapter 7 trustee’s attorneys, Fer-rette & Slater (“the firm”) applied for compensation under § 330(a)(1). At issue is whether the firm should be denied some, or all, of the requested compensation because 1) it performed services that fell within the ambit of the trustee’s duties under § 704 and 2) it performed services that were unnecessary to the administration of the estate and that offered no benefit to the estate under § 330(a)(3)(C).
The chapter 7 trustee, Richard M. Kip-perman (“the trustee”), also applied for compensation in the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- In Re Busy Beaver Building Centers, Inc. Kirkpatrick & LockhartCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Connolly v. Harris Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Roderick v. Levy (In Re Roderick Timber Co.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- In Re Shades of Beauty, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ferrette & Slater v. United States Trustee (In Re Garcia)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- In Re Lexington Hearth Lamp and Leisure, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2009
- In Re PruittUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 2004
- In re PetersonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2017
- In Re CastroUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.