Konopka-Sauer v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Martin Shulman, J.
Defendant, Colgate-Palmolive Company, a Delaware corporation with a principal place of business in New York (C-P or defendant), has filed an in limine motion of apparent first impression in asbestos litigation to apply Oregon law which would cap any potential noneconomic damages award plaintiffs, Lori *163Konopka-Sauer and Richard Konopka, as executors of the estate of Karen Tedrick, could receive in this personal injury/wrongful death action.
Factual Background1
Prior to her death, decedent plaintiff, Karen Tedrick (plaintiff, Karen or Tedrick), filed her…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Gonzales v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Neumeier v. KuehnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Cooney v. Osgood Machinery, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Vacco v. QuillSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Grund v. Delaware Charter Guarantee & Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Burns v. Delaware Charter Guarantee & Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011