Legal Opinion

Konopka-Sauer v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Martin Shulman, J.

Defendant, Colgate-Palmolive Company, a Delaware corporation with a principal place of business in New York (C-P or defendant), has filed an in limine motion of apparent first impression in asbestos litigation to apply Oregon law which would cap any potential noneconomic damages award plaintiffs, Lori *163Konopka-Sauer and Richard Konopka, as executors of the estate of Karen Tedrick, could receive in this personal injury/wrongful death action.

Factual Background1

Prior to her death, decedent plaintiff, Karen Tedrick (plaintiff, Karen or Tedrick), filed her…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Neumeier v. KuehnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Cooney v. Osgood Machinery, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Vacco v. QuillSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grund v. Delaware Charter Guarantee & Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  2. Burns v. Delaware Charter Guarantee & Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API