Legal Opinion
Madrigal v. Performance Food Group, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 7, 2021No. 5:21-cv-00021Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 JORGE MADRIGAL, Case No. 21-cv-00021-VKD 9 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 10 v. DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 11 PERFORMANCE TRANSPORTATION, LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 31 12 Defendant. 13 14 With the Court’s leave, on April 19, 2021, plaintiff Jorge Madrigal filed his first amended 15 complaint (“FAC”) against defendant Performance Transportation, LLC (“PTL”). Dkt. No. 30. 16 He asserts the following claims under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), Cal. 17 Gov’t Code § 12940 et seq.: (1)…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Conservation Force v. SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Carolyn Humphrey v. Memorial Hospitals AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.