Legal Opinion

Norman v. Hudleston

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1872PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Williamson county j the Hon. A. D. Duff, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Lawrence

Hudleston commenced an action of assumpsit against Norman, whereupon Norman filed this bill against Hudleston to enjoin the action and to procure a decree against Hudleston for the payment of money.

It appears that Norman and one McHenry were partners in trade in 1868, Norman having two-thirds of the business. Norman sold to Hudleston one-half of his interest, and soon afterwards bought the interest of McHenry, and sold to Hudleston one-half of that. After a few months, Norman sold his interest to J. J. and W. R. Mofield, and some months after that occurrence, Norman bought from Hudleston his…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wilcoxon v. WilcoxonIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Riddell v. RamseyMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Hamilton v. WellsIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Clark v. CarrAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892
  5. Hattenhauer v. AdamickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API