Legal Opinion
Federal Trade Commission v. QT, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 8, 2008No. 03 C 3578PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MORTON DENLOW, United States Magistrate Judge.
On December 22, 2006, the Court granted in part and denied in part Defendants’ motion to release frozen funds to pay their attorneys’ fees. The Court ordered any interest earned on the frozen accounts to be released to Defendants’ law firm, Ungaretti & Harris, LLP, (“Ungaretti”) on the condition that Ungaretti subject itself to this Court’s jurisdiction in the event the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) were to seek review of the order. On December 7, 2007, the FTC moved this Court to reconsider the December 22 order in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Leonard McKNIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Janeen O. Lonsdorf v. Ted Seefeldt, Jim Jenkins, Roger Johnson, Jerry Pionkowski, Jack Deyong, Group Health Cooperative, HmoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Ty Inc., Counterdefendant-Appellee v. Softbelly's, Inc., Counter-Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Ty Warner, Counterdefendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Federal Trade Commission v. QT, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- Cleveland Hair Clinic, Inc. v. PuigCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cusamano v. SobekDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2009