Legal Opinion
Scelza v. Ryba
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 2, 1957PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHoward T. Hogan, J.
This is an action to foreclose a mortgage upon real property. Defendants deny they were in default, and allege as an affirmative defense that they made due and timely payment of the installment of principal and interest in question, which amounted to a total of $77.55.
It appears that on June 4,1956 defendants gave to plaintiff a purchase-money mortgage in the amount of $11,750, which provided for interest and an installment on account of principal in the total sum of $77.55 to be paid on the first day of each month, with an allotted grace period of 15 days. For some time those payments were…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nove Holding Corp. v. SchechterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- De Witt v. PattersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Wedab Corp. v. WeingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bisno v. SaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Karas v. WassermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration v. ContessaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023
- Key International Manufacturing, Inc. v. StillmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Love Equipment Rentals, Inc., an Arizona Corporation v. Harden W. Breinholt Mark D. Eggertsen Rein W. Irwin Donald Nabity and Paul R. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969