Legal Opinion

People v. Spa Xanadu, Inc.

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided April 10, 1978PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Stanley Gartenstein, J.

The court has conducted a joint single-Judge trial of two separate accusatory instruments involving a common set of facts and question of law. Upon a verdict of guilty as to both charges, the present corporate defendant was substituted without objection for the individual named defendant, an émployee thereof, and decision reserved after argument on the question of sentence.

*11We now consider the issue of an apparently confiscatory penal statute whose validity is not under direct or collateral attack and its impact, if any, upon the ultimate disposition…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Namro Holding Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  2. Namro Holding Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. People v. Namro Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  4. People v. Namro Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. Namro Holding Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. NYRA & Barterama, Inc.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API