Legal Opinion

People v. Namro Holding Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 30, 1960PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Burke and Foster; Judges Froessel and Van Voorhis dissent and vote to reverse in the following memorandum: The majority of this court has voted to affirm upon the ground that the propriety of the notice of violation may not be collaterally reviewed in this criminal action, and without reaching the question as to whether there was in fact a violation of the fire exit rules. With this we cannot agree.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. Cedar Management Corp.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1975
  2. People v. KaufmannAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1985
  3. People v. New York Racing Ass'n & Barterama & Barterama, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1986
  4. People v. Spa Xanadu, Inc.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1978
  5. People v. NYRA & Barterama, Inc.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1984