Legal Opinion
Gardner v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided January 22, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Coitet by
Judge Dietzman
Affirming as to the Live Poultry Transit Company and reversing as to the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company.
In this action the appellant, who was the plaintiff helow, seeks to recover damages'on account of losses he claims he sustained by reason of the alleged negligent delay of the appellee in furnishing him specially Constructed live poultry cars owned by the appellee, Live Poultry Transit Company, for the purpose of transporting live poultry from Worthville, Ky., to Pittsburg and Philadelphia, Pa. After putting in issue the allegations of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. International Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. Puritan Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Mitchell Coal & Coke Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Dayton-Goose Creek Railway Co. v. United States, Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Ellis v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. FontaineCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Huffman v. National Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. BrashearCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Walters v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927