Legal Opinion

G. D. C. Corp. v. National Tire Dealers & Retreaders Ass'n

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 1960No. 2484PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge.

For a second time, this case is before us. On the former appeal, we ordered a new trial, holding, among other things, that the evidence was sufficient to constitute a bailment and that it was error to dismiss the action as to the G. D. C. Corporation without a showing of due care on its part. National Tire Dealers & Retreaders Ass’n v. G. D. C. Corp., D.C.Mun.App.1959, 147 A.2d 869.

Upon remand, the suit was again tried to the court. At the conclusion of the evidence, the court found that the Corporation failed to exercise due care, but did not make a finding concerning…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shea v. FridleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. National Tire Dealers & Retreaders Ass'n v. G. D. C. Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Sibert v. EllisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Howell v. SteffeyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
  2. NATION-WIDE CHECK CORPORATION v. BanksDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Cohen v. CohenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API