Legal Opinion

Etiwan Fertilizer Co. v. Johns

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 12, 1946No. 15829PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Associate Justice Taylor

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

This action, commenced by the service of a Summons and Complaint on June 10, 1938, was one upon a past-due note, given for the payment of fertilizer purchased by the payor from the payee, and was between the original payee and payor and the latter’s endorser.

The amount stated in the note was $10,899.20 with interest at 7% per annum from May 15, 1937, until paid together with 10% attorneys’ fees in case of suit or collection by attorney. The plaintiff alleged the aforementioned amount as being due, less a credit of $1,307.90 as of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gladden v. KeistlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  2. C. G. Gunter, Inc. v. HindmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  3. Martin v. Traxler Real Estate Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. American Cyanamid Co. v. PageDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1975
  2. Condon v. Best View Cablevision, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  3. MBAFB Federal Credit Union v. JenretteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API