Legal Opinion

Jay Cee Fish Co. v. Cannarella

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided January 4, 1968No. Civ. A. No. 66-576PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SIMONS, District Judge.

This action on an account was commenced by plaintiff against defendant on August 5, 1966 seeking to recover $12,-700.49 allegedly due for certain quantities of fish delivered to defendant’s seafood markets and for which defendant has refused to pay upon demand.

Defendant’s answer, after setting out a general denial, admits plaintiff sold fish to him over a period of time but denies that he ever owed plaintiff $12,700.-49. Defendant alleges that a novation took place and that defendant sent plaintiff checks totaling $8,947.85 written on the Florence Seafood…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ophuls & Hill, Inc. v. Carolina Ice & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  2. Callaham v. RidgewaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  3. Durkey v. ArndtDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1942
  4. Edward Petry & Co. v. Greater Huntington Radio Corp.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1965
  5. Scott v. StoneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Vandeventer v. All American Life & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  2. Hemisphere National Bank v. District of Columbia Insurance Guaranty Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. McLeod v. Sandy Island Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  4. McLeod v. Sandy Island Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  5. Robert L. Vandeventer, Duane D. Woodrow, and B. Legare Walpole, Jr. v. All American Life & Casualty Company N/K/A All American Life Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API