Jay Cee Fish Co. v. Cannarella
District Court, D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SIMONS, District Judge.
This action on an account was commenced by plaintiff against defendant on August 5, 1966 seeking to recover $12,-700.49 allegedly due for certain quantities of fish delivered to defendant’s seafood markets and for which defendant has refused to pay upon demand.
Defendant’s answer, after setting out a general denial, admits plaintiff sold fish to him over a period of time but denies that he ever owed plaintiff $12,700.-49. Defendant alleges that a novation took place and that defendant sent plaintiff checks totaling $8,947.85 written on the Florence Seafood…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ophuls & Hill, Inc. v. Carolina Ice & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- Callaham v. RidgewaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Durkey v. ArndtDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1942
- Edward Petry & Co. v. Greater Huntington Radio Corp.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1965
- Scott v. StoneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Vandeventer v. All American Life & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Hemisphere National Bank v. District of Columbia Insurance Guaranty Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- McLeod v. Sandy Island Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- McLeod v. Sandy Island Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- Robert L. Vandeventer, Duane D. Woodrow, and B. Legare Walpole, Jr. v. All American Life & Casualty Company N/K/A All American Life Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.