Byrd v. City of North Augusta
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Littlejohn, Justice:
The plaintiffs, Byrds, instituted this action against the City of North Augusta and its governing officials (hereinafter referred to as the City), wherein they ask (1) for declaratory judgment holding that they may use the real estate in controversy for commercial purposes, (2) that the court declare the 1971 North Augusta Zoning Ordinance unconstitutional and invalid insofar as it applies to and attempts to rezone said real estate in a manner contrary to the. restrictive covenants imposed upon the property prior to' annexation into the City, and (3) for a writ of mandamus…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Allen-Parker Co. v. LollisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
3Cited by8 opinions
- Scott v. Greenville CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- Gurganious v. City of BeaufortCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
- Knowles v. City of AikenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- City of Myrtle Beach v. Juel P. Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
- G.T. Scott v. Greenville CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.