Legal Opinion
In Re Upstream Addicks and Barker (Texas) Flood-Control Reservoirs v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 15, 2021No. 17-9001Published
1Opinion of the Court
In the United States Court of Federal Claims Sub-Master Docket No. 17-9001L (Filed: December 15, 2021) IN RE UPSTREAM ADDICKS AND Motion to certify class; timeliness; Rule 23 BARKER (TEXAS) FLOOD- criteria CONTROL RESERVOIRS THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO: ALL UPSTREAM CASES Daniel H. Charest and E. Lawrence Vincent, Burns Charest LLP, Dallas, Texas, Charles Irvine, Irvine & Conner PLLC, Houston, Texas, and Edwin Armistead Easterby, Williams Hart Boundas Easterby, LLP, Houston, Texas, Co-Lead Counsel for Upstream Plaintiffs. Kristine S. Tardiff, Trial Attorney, Environment & Natural Resources…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.