Commonwealth v. Donahue
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rhodes, J.,
Appellant’s contention is that the evidence presented at the trial failed to establish the offense charged in the indictment upon which she was tried. She was indicted under section 1 of the Act of July 16, 1917, P. L. 1000, 18 PS §831, as the pathic and not the actor. A police officer was an eyewitness, and testified to the occurrence. He fully described what he saw and found, and the conditions which he observed. He also testified without objection that appellant, when apprehended, admitted what they were doing, stated that this was the first time she had done such a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. GageSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BowesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- United States v. KellyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1954
- Commonwealth v. HornbergerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Commonwealth v. ZieglerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. StreuberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.