Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Carter

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 2010No. 2006AP1811-CRPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partPatience Drake Roggensack, J.

¶ 88. (concurring!dissenting). I concur in that part of the majority opinion that concludes that Patrick Carter is due 302 days of sentence credit for the period between the date on which he finished his Illinois Driving Under the Influence (DUI) sentence, December 21, 2003, and the commencement of his Illinois armed robbery sentence, October 19, 2004.1 However, because no legal process caused Carter's custody in Illinois to be "in connection with" the Wisconsin crime2 until: (1) Illinois issued a fugitive warrant for Carter's arrest, based on the Illinois fugitive complaint, and (2) Carter…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. BeetsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Spiegelberg v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. GaviganCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  4. State v. DemarsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  5. State v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API