Legal Opinion

Murriel-Don Coal Co., Inc. v. Aspen Ins. UK Ltd.

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided May 20, 2011No. Civil 11-23-ARTPublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

AMUL R. THAPAR, District Judge.

When a fisherman wants his boat to stay put in a harbor, he ties it to a dock. When a plaintiff wants his case to stay put in state court, he ties it to a non-diverse defendant. But that might not always be enough to keep the case moored where the plaintiff wants it. Under the doctrine of “fraudulent joinder,” federal courts may sever the non-diverse defendant from the case if the claim against him is so frivolous that its only conceivable purpose is to destroy diversity and prevent removal. The two diverse defendants in this case,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Lincoln Property Co. v. RocheSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Williams MD v. Homeland InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
  2. Freitas v. McKesson Corp.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2012
  3. Christensen v. ATS, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2014
  4. Combs v. ICG Hazard, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2013
  5. Ullman v. Safeway InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2013

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API