Legal Opinion

Olan Mills, Inc. v. City of Elizabethtown

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 25, 1954PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice. .

The only question presented on this appeal is whether an ordinance, enacted by the city council of Elizabethtown, imposes an undue and discriminatory burden upon interstate commerce in violation of Article I, § 8, Clause 3 of the Constitution of the United States, commonly known as the “commerce clause,” and is therefore unenforceable as to appellant, a nonresident corporation doing business in Kentucky. When we employ the term, “nonresident” in this opinion, we refer in each instance to a person having his or its situs out of the state.

The ordinance imposes a license fee…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nippert v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Cordell v. Commonwealth ex rel. City of PrestonsburgCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953
  3. City of Winchester v. Lohrey Packing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Olan Mills, Inc. v. City of NicholasvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1955
  2. Mills v. Town of KingstreeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  3. Budget Marketing, Inc. v. Commonwealth ex rel. StephensKentucky Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Olan Mills, Inc. v. City of MaysvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1954
  5. City of Watertown v. HagySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API