Legal Opinion
United States v. Duong
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided September 24, 2004No. C1-04-050PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO SUPPRESS
HOVLAND, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Diana Courteny Duong’s Motion to Suppress Ev idence filed on August 10, 2004. The motion to suppress relates to evidence seized by law enforcement officers on February 11, 2004. Co-Defendant Thanh-Mai Thi Truong has joined in Duong’s motion. On August 20, 2004, the Government filed a response resisting the motion to suppress. An evidentiary hearing was held on September 3, 2004, in Bismarck, North Dakota. For the reasons outlined below, the motion to suppress is denied.
I. BACKGROUND
On February 11,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. HallDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2005
- United States v. Kimhong Thi LeDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2005
- United States v. ThompsonDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2005