Legal Opinion
United States v. Kimhong Thi Le
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided November 28, 2005No. C1-05-02PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS
HOVLAND, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is the defendant, Kim-hong Thi Le’s Motion to Suppress Evidence filed on August 26, 2005. The motion to suppress relates to evidence seized by law enforcement officers on February 11, 2004. The Government has filed a response resisting the motion. An eviden-tiary hearing was held on November 8, 2005, in Bismarck, North Dakota. For the reasons outlined below, the motion to suppress is denied.
I. BACKGROUND 1
On February 9, 2004, an individual named Thanh Mai Truong, rented a 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor SUV with…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Florida v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Mar James, Also Known as James BeineCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2019