Legal Opinion

Hollywood Theatre Corp. v. City of Indianapolis

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1941No. 27,500PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichman, J.

Under certain ordinances included in its Building Code and Municipal Code adopted in 1925, and amendments thereto, the City of Indianapolis required of appellant a license fee for operating its moving picture theater and that its building be inspected for compliance with regulatory provisions, some of which were designed to prevent fire hazards. The State Fire Marshal is given certain authority with respect to moving picture theaters by § 7 of ch. 192 of the Acts of 1913 as amended by § 2 of ch. 115 of the Acts of 1927 (§ 20-807, Burns’ 1933, § 9521, Baldwin’s 1934) and by ch. 83 of the Acts…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mutual Film Corp. v. Industrial Commission of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Schmidt v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Mutual Film Corporation of Missouri v. George H. HodgesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Medias v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Spitler v. Town of MunsterIndiana Supreme Court · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Board of Comrs. of Greene County v. UsreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Ensign v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
  3. City of Richmond v. S.M.O., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. City of Seattle v. BittnerWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  5. City of Seattle v. BittnerWashington Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API